lamega.com

NBA star thinks big for Scotland.

Daily Mail (London) June 10, 2003 | Greechan, John Byline: JOHN GREECHAN SCOTLAND’S basketball team will need to make a giant leap if they are to qualify for the Commonwealth Games.

How fortunate we all are, then, to have an athlete of the stature of Robert Archibald on our side.

Easily Scotland’s biggest player, he earns that title not because he stands just an inch short of seven feet – but because he’s living an all-American dream of playing in the NBA.

For now, he’s back home, only for a short while, but he promises to return when qualifying begins for basketball’s Games debut in 2006. in our site nba schedule 2012

Archibald, who has just completed his first year with the Memphis Grizzlies, is hopeful that he can fit the qualifiers in around an 82-game NBA schedule which pits him against the world’s greatest players on an almost nightly basis.

The Paisley- born, Fife- raised player has already enhanced the national reputation by becoming the first Scot to play in the No.1 league on the planet.

Sitting in an Edinburgh hotel yesterday, he outlined his plans to follow in the giant footsteps of father Bobby, one of Scotland’s greatest-ever players.

‘Obviously, playing for Scotland is very, very important to me,’ said Archibald.

‘It was maybe even more of a dream than playing in the NBA when I was growing up.

‘ That was partly because I thought that playing in the NBA was a pipe-dream.

‘The most important thing about getting free for these qualifying games is that I want to do it. There are guys in the NBA who play for Germany, Spain, other countries, so it can be done. go to site nba schedule 2012

‘Obviously, there are contractual issues and the schedule to be worked out but these are fairly simple things to get sorted out.

‘ The NBA schedule runs form November until April, there are 82 games and it probably should be a game every other day but, in reality, it doesn’t work out like that.

‘ Sometimes, you only get two games a week, other times you’ve got a stretch of eight games in 12 days all over the country, so you’re flying to LA, Seattle, back to Memphis, then New York and Philadelphia.

‘It is a demanding schedule but Scotland is something that’s important to me.

‘My dad had a stellar career for Scotland and, really, I’ve got six months of an off-season – that’s plenty to squeeze in a few weeks to follow his lead.’ Scotland will be in a group of 10 European countries trying to qualify for Melbourne 2006, with matches provisionally scheduled to start a year before the Games – and probably only one country qualifying.

That means Scotland would have to edge out favourites England and other contenders like Cyprus along the way, a daunting task.

Archibald, having progressed through American High School and college basketball in order to edge out thousands of homegrown hopefuls for a spot in the NBA, is naturally undaunted.

‘Obviously, it would be tough to beat England,’ he conceded.

‘But I don’t think there is any reason to set our goal as just competing with them.

‘ We are setting our sights on beating them and qualifying. The talent is here in Scotland and we definitely have good enough players.

‘It’s time for us to set our goals a little higher, to aim at getting into the Games and playing against some of the elite countries.’ Greechan, John

LETTERS

The Gazette (Colorado Springs, CO) December 11, 2009 George Will on pot As a conservative myself, I found George Will’s editorial on Dec. 8 concerning medical marijuana to be confusing and misleading. This surprises me, since Will is an intellectual conservative who usually searches out the truth. Nothing about this article was truthful, but it was filled with inuendos and presuppositions.

While commenting on Colorado’s medical marijuana laws, he begins by calling the dispensaries “fiction.” He believes that “most really just want to smoke pot” instead of using the weed to help alleviate pain and different ailments. So, where are his accurate statistics about “most.” How does he come to that conclusion?

He quotes Colorado’s attorney general, John Suthers, who is “trying to save his state from institutionalizing such hypocrisy.” Such a lofty statement since Will, Suthers, and other politicians mock the fact medical marijuana is used for “chronic pain.” Mr. Will even perpetuates the myth that there are drugs available to deal with chemo nausea. While there are such drugs, their effectiveness is in question in terms of nausea relief. go to web site global warming hoax

He even has the audacity to equate Nevada’s prostitution industry of taxation and regulation with medical marijuana. Mr. Will then tries to equate marijuana usage with methamphetamine addiction. Where did this intellectual come up with these supposed facts and scholarly pronouncements?

All I know is my wife has been in chronic pain for more than three years. The doctors have had her on Vicodin and Oxycontin. One suggested a morphine pump be surgically implanted in her spine. Another doctor wanted her to try Ketamine – an LSD-type drug.

So, the medical community can promote these hard drugs but is paralyzed to recommend medical marijuana which has decreased her pain? And, George Will continues the fear-mongering.

Tommy Latham Colorado Springs Uninvited to speak Steve Rabey’s good article, “Professor Univited to Speak at School” (Dec. 4), misses one important part of the story. When Colorado Spring School administrators rescinded the invitation to Jane Hilberry to keynote their literary conference, they said they were doing so because she writes for “adult audiences.” But all previous keynoters of the same conference, myself included, have also written material suitable only for adults.

We were trusted to tailor our remarks to the age level of our audience, which is exactly what Jane would have done. A double standard is being applied to Jane, who is my colleague at Colorado College. If the same standard were applied to the rest of us, none of us would be a suitable speaker at the Colorado Springs School.

The point is that, like Jane, we are professionals who know how to speak to diverse audiences. The administrators at CSS have made their decision based on false assumptions, and without bothering to learn that Jane Hilberry is a widely experienced, highly regarded teacher of writing to students of all ages.

If she is not suitable as a speaker on this occasion, then neither am I – and neither is any good writer I know.

David Mason Colorado Springs The global warming hoax This is in response to a letter by Scott Stevens (“Global Warming is Truth,” Dec. 5).

Stevens said: Pine beetles are due to global warming. Yet in 1973 – when the media claimed an ice age was coming – the beetle had one of the largest infestations, according to the US Forest Service.

You say: CO2 is killing forests. Yet carbon dioxide (CO2) is the principal gas that trees and other plants need to survive, just like oxygen (O2) is the principal gas that humans and other animals require. Trees absorb CO2 and release O2 – animals inhale O2 and exhale CO2. See how nice this all works? see here global warming hoax

Earth’s first, primitive forests made their prolific debut 300 million years ago during the Carboniferous Period. Before then, the atmosphere held far more CO2 but concentrations declined throughout the Carboniferous Period as plants flourished. During the Carboniferous Period the atmosphere became greatly depleted of CO2 (declining from about 2,500 parts per million to 350 parts per million) so that by the end of the Carboniferous the CO2- impoverished atmosphere was less favorable to plant life and plant growth slowed dramatically. Today, CO2 concentrations are barely at 380 parts per million – still CO2-impoverished. Many scientists strongly believe that we should be trying to produce more CO2, not less.

All major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA’s GISS, UAH, RSS) have released updated data. All show that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped precipitously.

The total amount of cooling ranges from 0.65C up to 0.75C – a value large enough to wipe out most of the warming recorded over the past 100 years. All in one year’s time. For all four sources, it’s the single fastest temperature change ever recorded, either up or down.

I suggest Mr Stevens that you take your own advice and study a little bit more about this hoax of global warming.

Helen Sabin Colorado Springs Gen. Rayburn’s integrity Once again, Maj. Gen. Bentley Rayburn (USAF, ret.) has demonstrated the quality of his integrity. When confronted with accusations of plagiarism by Gazette writer Barry Noreen (“Stop the general before he steals again”, Dec. 2) the general stood tall and accepted responsibility and apologized to all concerned.

I worked for Gen. Rayburn in Saudi Arabia and he expected his subordinates to take responsibility for their actions.

It is extremely refreshing to see the general expect no less of himself. There were no weak excuses given and there were no political spins to justify. It was simply a man of integrity standing up and admitting that he had disappointed himself and others.

Mr. Noreen’s comment that Gen. Rayburn should consider himself “dismissed” was certainly ludicrous. When a man emerges with the strength and humility of the general, our community should not “dismiss” the leader.

Instead, we need to explore how best we can tap into the character and skill set he brings to the table. Not only do we need Bentley Rayburn in leadership, we need many more of his caliber.

Tony D. Barnes Colorado Springs

NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL STAFF MEMBERS NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL STAFF MEMBERS HOLD A CONFERENCE CALL ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA’S TRIP TO OTTAWA, CANADA

Washington Transcript Service February 17, 2009

Washington Transcript Service 02-17-2009 NSC STAFF MEMBERS HOLD A CONFERENCE CALL FEBRUARY 17, 2009 SPEAKERS: BILL BURTON, DEPUTY PRESS SECRETARY DENIS MCDONOUGH, DIRECTOR OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL [*] BURTON: Hi there. Thank you all for joining the call. I’m the deputy press secretary.

We are — Denis is going to give a statement here. And then we will take as many questions as time will allow. And if you have any follow-up, And now here is Denis McDonough.

MCDONOUGH: Thanks a lot. Thanks a lot, Bill.

And thanks, everybody, for joining this afternoon.

On Thursday morning, President Obama will fly to Ottawa on his first foreign visit as president. He will depart Andrews and arrive at Ottawa International Airport, where he will be greeted by the governor general of Canada and His Excellency Jean-Daniel Lafond. As you all know, the governor general Michaelle Jean, is the queen’s representative in Canada.

After the welcome at the — welcome and meeting at the airport, the president will proceed to Parliament Hill in Ottawa, where he’ll meet with the prime minister, Stephen Harper, and, after the meeting with the prime minister, will proceed to a working lunch with the prime minister and several of his ministers.

The president will be joined in that lunch with members of his official delegation, which will include General Jim Jones, the president’s national security adviser, Dr. Larry Summers, the chairman of the National Economic Council, Carol Browner, who is the energy and climate coordinator in the White House, John Brennan, who is the assistant to the president for homeland security and counterterrorism matters, and Deputy Secretary of State Jim Steinberg, as well as White House spokesman Robert Gibbs.

After the lunch, there will be a joint press availability in the reading room with the president and the prime minister. And upon conclusion of the press availability, they will proceed to — back to the Ottawa International Airport, where there will be a meeting with opposition party leader Michael Ignatieff. And then we’ll have a greeting with U.S. embassy personnel and then return from Ottawa International to Andrews.

The president is very eager to make the trip to Canada. He was both touched and honored that he was invited to Canada by Prime Minister Harper. He looks very much forward to it.

He obviously recognizes that there is no larger trading partner or important economic partner for the United States than Canada, and that will be one of the principal issues or the primary issue that they’ll discuss on Thursday, namely the economy.

There will be a lot of discussion of the economic recovery plan that the president is signing today and the synergies of that plan with the stimulus package that Prime Minister Harper has proposed in Canada, as obviously both of them have infrastructure investment — investment and clean and renewable energy and green jobs and tax cuts for working families.

They’ll also, obviously, be discussing, given the fact that Canada is the largest energy provider to the United States, our shared interests in energy and the environment, significant discussion of cooperation on clean energy technology. And the president is hopeful that they can — that he’ll be able to build on the very productive conversation he had with President Calderon of Mexico last month here in Washington before he was sworn in, wherein he and President Calderon talked about possibilities for carbon abatement, energy — clean energy technology, and a partnership among the three North American countries on those issues.

And then, of course, the last set of issues they’ll discuss relate to the global security challenges that we jointly face, one, of course, being Afghanistan. I think you may have all seen some reporting already on an interview that the president gave earlier today on that matter, but also obviously want to discuss upcoming summits, including the NATO summit next month and, of course, the Summit of the Americas shortly thereafter.

Canada continues to be a leader in the hemisphere, having dedicated a lot of resources to Haiti and throughout the region, having appointed an envoy for the region, and having over the years been a real leader for democratization throughout the hemisphere.

So, as I said, the president looks very much forward to the — to the — to the visit. I think he has expressed his hope to Prime Minister Harper that this will be an opportunity for them to deepen their personal relationship, as well as the working relationship between two vitally important friends and allies.

With that, I’ll stop my opening remarks and look forward to your questions.

QUESTION: Hello, Denis and Bill. One quick question. Just to confirm, this is the first — President Obama’s first face-to-face meeting as president with another foreign leader, right?

MCDONOUGH: That — that is…

BURTON: As president.

QUESTION: As president.

BURTON: During the transition, there was the meeting with the Mexican president.

MCDONOUGH: Yes, that is correct.

QUESTION: And can you please just speak a little bit more — elaborate on the import of Larry Summers and Carol Browner being a part of the delegation?

MCDONOUGH: Well, you know, the — the president is obviously, as I said, eager to develop a close, personal working relationship with the prime minister, but he also wanted to have some of his key White House staff join the delegation. Obviously, the White House staff are closely coordinating with their agencies here in Washington.

But given the — the strong importance the economic recovery plan and the investments that the president and Congress have called for in that plan, he thought it would be very important to have Larry along on the delegation to make sure that there is an opportunity to, as I said before, look at the synergies and the opportunities in these two packages, both Canadian package and the president’s economic recovery plan.

Obviously, trade, as I mentioned before, is a piece of that.

It’s a $1.5 billion trading relationship back and forth every day. And, of course, as I mentioned with Dr. Browner, that given the — the simple fact that Canada is our largest energy supplier and given the fact that we share, obviously, a lot of environmental concerns and a lot of geography, and obviously given that we want to begin to prepare for the global efforts that will be undertaken over the course of this year, we want to make sure that we hit the ground running with a very important neighbor and ally.

QUESTION: Thank you. this web site national security council

QUESTION: Hey, Denis. Hey, Bill.

I just had two questions on trade. Is President Obama going to do anything to begin renegotiating NAFTA in this — in this meeting? The Canadian Broadcasting interview suggests that that’s been set a time — aside from the time being, in that President Obama says there are a lot of sensitivities right now because of the huge decline in world trade.

Has — has that goal been set aside for the time being? Or is there actually going to be something on that?

And, secondly, the Canadians have been, you know, taking some umbrage at the “buy American” provisions in the stimulus package, even though they were tamped down slightly with the provision that they not violate international law or international agreements with the United States.

Is there anything that President Obama is going to be able to offer them to kind of tamp down their concerns on that?

MCDONOUGH: Thanks for the question, and thanks for getting on the call. It’s good to hear your voice.

The — I would just say a couple of things. I think just the most important point I think was the last one you made, namely that particularly at a moment of — of such global economic and financial tumult, I think the president said today and I’m sure you’re all see it tonight that one of the lessons from history is to avoid any signals that suggest that we were — that anybody is engaging in practices that may further result — result in further declines of international trade. I think the — the numbers that we’ve all seen already are significant enough.

In terms of what the president has to offer on trade, I think he wants to underscore the importance of what is already a very robust trading relationship. As I mentioned, $1.5 billion in two-way trade every day.

It’s the largest trading relationship in the world, and he wants to look for ways to — to grow on that as it relates to new entrepreneurial and innovative technologies on energy and green technology.

And then, as it relates to the “buy America” provision, I think the president’s been very clearly on the record on this, in that — that the provision is obviously going to be implemented consistent with our international trade obligations, with our WTO obligations, and with our NAFTA obligations.

So I think my sense is that, after hearing from him directly, there will be no need to take umbrage or to be uneasy, but — but rather to — to recognize that this is a real partner and making sure that we have our — our working families across this country getting back to work.

And that’s the president’s goal.

As it relates to NAFTA, I think you’re very familiar with his views that the labor and environmental standards that are side agreements in the NAFTA agreement are — and many other agreements — central to or a fundamental part of those trade agreements, I think his view has been that he would like to work with our Canadian and Mexican friends to help them understand why his position makes good sense.

And I think this visit, like the discussion with President Calderon last month, will be an opportunity to do that.

BURTON: All right, sir, does that answer your question?

QUESTION: Just — is he going to make any effort to — to press for that in this — in this? It sounds like you’re saying, yes, he will try to at least ask the Canadian prime minister to go along with the changes in the NAFTA agreement he would seek.

MCDONOUGH: Again, I just think that what — what I was saying is that he obviously, given the — the delicate state of the global economy, wants to make clear to — to Prime Minister Harper and to all of our trading partners that this is no time to — for anybody to give the impression that somehow we are interested in less, rather than more trade, and that’s — that’s the message that he’ll underscore.

QUESTION: Hey, guys. I have a question just first about Afghanistan. It’s — what is the kind of — Denis, you briefly mentioned Afghanistan as being on the agenda. What is his message? Will he even go down the road of asking them to reconsider pulling out of Afghanistan in a few years?

And then just second, just to follow up on NAFTA, by saying it’s not the time to do anything that could hurt trade, are you saying that he is — that’s just not something he’s going to even, you know, go — go down that road at all until the economy is back on track, so that’s essentially on hold right now, that concept of him renegotiating the trade agreements?

MCDONOUGH: Thanks. As it relates to Afghanistan, part of the message is going to be one of appreciation for the efforts that our Canadian allies have undertaken in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is the largest recipient of Canadian foreign assistance. Canada has had troops on the ground in Afghanistan alongside American forces since day one in this important mission.

And they have lost 108 Canadian soldiers in this effort.

And so Canada, like this country, has made a big sacrifice as it relates to stability and security in Afghanistan. So the first message the president will convey is one of appreciation.

As it relates to going forward, the president will make clear that we are engaged in a comprehensive review, a comprehensive strategic review, that it’s his belief that it’s not — there’s not a military solution alone to Afghanistan, but that it will require all elements of our national power, all elements of our friends’ and allies’ national power to ensure that we have an opportunity to have stability and security in both Afghanistan and Pakistan.

So I think he looks forward to having that discussion with the prime minister and with the prime minister’s team. And my sense is that it will be the — just the start of a discussion on these matters as we undertake this important strategic review over the next month- and-a-half or so.

And as it relates to NAFTA, I think, again, the president’s position is well known to you. I mean, you’ve been covering him now for — for some time.

But in terms of, you know, the opportunity this week is that I think the president will just underscore his belief that these are important matters, labor and environmental standards are important matters, and that he’ll look forward to — to working both with Mexico and with Canada to try to underscore his view on these — on these two important issues.

BURTON: All right, we’re going to take two more questions.

QUESTION: Hi, gentlemen. Thanks for arranging this call. My question is regard to the Alberta oil sands. What’s the White House’s position on the — on the oil sands, particularly since these — these imports are — they’re only going to increase in the coming years, as the work on climate change goes on in both countries and internationally?

And then, second, what sorts of agreements or commitments to work, however small, do you want to get out of this meeting on a North American climate treaty or a carbon cap that’s been raised by Canadian Environmental Minister Jim Prentice in the recent days?

MCDONOUGH: Yes, well, thanks for the question. A couple of things as it relates to — I think that the president would hope to be able to make some progress on cooperative energy technologies, on building on some of the success that we’ve had on some experimental or test-level capabilities on things like carbon capture and sequestration.

I’m sure you’re aware that the economic recovery package includes about $3.5 billion for CCS. And it’s the kind of innovative technology I think that we’re all going to have to get our hands around if we’re going make the kind of progress that we all believe we need to on climate and to meet the president’s goals that he laid out in the campaign and has reiterated as president-elect and then as president, to see the kind of reductions in carbon output, carbon emissions that are going to be necessary to stave off some of the worst impacts of climate change. website national security council

As it relates to — as it relates to the oil sands, the president is obviously aware of the concerns that have been expressed about — about that resource. He obviously, as I mentioned at the beginning, considers Canada a very valuable partner as it relates to energy and energy security.

And that’s why part of what they’re going to be discussing on Thursday is the kind of clean energy technology, like is called for in terms of the investments in the Canadian package and the recovery package in the — in the president’s economic recovery package, things like carbon capture and sequestration, that will allow us to access abundant resources, including coal in this country.

And that’s the — that’s the kind of concrete steps that he’ll want to take, but he also wants to see if there’s some opportunity to build on what he discussed with President Calderon, namely opportunities among the three countries to look for carbon abatement options or carbon abatement targets. President Calderon laid out a pretty ambitious vision of 50 percent reduction of carbon emissions by 2050. And — and that’s in a — you know, an economy in Mexico that is — continues to be developing.

And so what the president believes is that, with appropriate science and cooperative technology among the three countries, we can find new and innovative opportunities to advance an innovative agenda that will allow not just the United States, but our two neighbors to be real leaders on green energy, low carbon energy opportunities here, as we push ahead on — on the important agenda of climate change and carbon emission reduction.

BURTON: All right, one more.

QUESTION: Hi, gentlemen. I’m new in Washington, and thanks for letting me in on this call. I wanted to ask, I’ve been to a number of briefings relating to this visit. And I guess, not surprisingly, there’s an exceptional amount of interest from journalists around the world, given the fact that this is the president’s first visit outside of the country.

Is that something you’re mindful of? And can you talk a little bit about whether you see the trip to Ottawa as a sort of platform beyond speaking just to Canadians? Will you be — will the president be sending any kind of message globally?

And additionally, there’s a lot of consternation today, as, of course, there is in the U.S., about the state of the auto sector. And I’m wondering if auto issues are going to be climbing higher on the agenda, given the state of play today.

MCDONOUGH: Well, on the autos, the question — welcome to Washington, by the way…

QUESTION: Thank you.

MCDONOUGH: … the — as it relates to autos, obviously, the news today, but also I think the news that the president and the stories the president heard over the course of the last several months, if not years, as he traveled this country, about — and heard from autoworkers about the challenges that they’re facing, this has been a big priority issue for him and it will maintain — it will continue to be as such.

And, obviously, given the — the integrated nature of the North American auto industry, the president will be discussing this in Ottawa with Prime Minister Harper and looking for opportunities to ensure that we have a vibrant auto sector here.

As it relates to the message that the president wants to send the world with this trip, I mean, I think the fact of the matter is, the president believes that every day is an opportunity for the United States to send a clear message to the world.

That’s why I think he invested as much time as he did and as much effort as he did in trying to ensure that we sent a clear signal to the rest of the world that the United States was leading on this economic recovery package that we’re trying to dramatically expand demand at a difficult time in the economy.

That’s, I think, why he made very clear right out of the box that he wanted to play a leadership role as it relates to the Middle East, his first day in the Oval Office picking up the phone and engaging leaders in the Middle — in Israel, among the Palestinian Authority, and Egypt, and Jordan, Saudi Arabia, making clear that we wanted to be actively involved in efforts to consolidate the cease-fire there and now building on a cease-fire to ensure that we have the kind of peace and security that everybody in that region so — so eagerly wants.

And so there’s no question that the trip itself offers a new — an opportunity to do just that. And I think one of the things the president will be underscoring is similar to what Secretary Clinton is underscoring on her trip, which is that it’s vitally important that America revitalize its alliances, look for opportunities to use those alliances to advance our shared goals and our shared interests, be that on global challenges like Afghanistan, or democracy throughout the — the hemisphere, or concrete and aggressive efforts to stem global climate change.

I think that the president sees this opportunity to head up to Ottawa as a good opportunity to do just that.

QUESTION: Well, thank you.

BURTON: Well, thank you all for joining the call. As I said at the beginning, this is Bill Burton. And if you have any questions, you again.

MCDONOUGH: Thanks, everybody.

END

NO PORTION OF THIS TRANSCRIPTION MAY BE COPIED, SOLD OR RETRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL DOCUMENT CLEARING HOUSE, INC.